This is a placeholder / example of where all research articles would be listed…
Title: Published
Debridement Versus Simple Scrubbing of External Fixator Pin Sites
- Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612902/
- Authors: Jack Nolte, Johnathan Dallman, William Tucker, Erin Christensen, Archie Heddings
- Journal: Kansas Journal of Medicine
- Publication Date: October 24, 2022
- Abstract:
- Introduction: Irrigation and debridement of external fixator pin sites are methods utilized by some orthopedic surgeons to minimize the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing definitive internal fixation after temporization in an external fixation device. This study aimed to determine if irrigation and debridement of external fixator pin sites leads to fewer deep surgical site infections, compared to simply scrubbing the external fixator pin sites with a chlorhexidine scrub-brush.
- Methods: This single center retrospective cohort study was performed at a university level I trauma center. All cases in which a single surgeon removed an external fixator and followed this with definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the same operative setting between October 2007 and October 2018 were reviewed. A total of 313 patients were temporized in 334 external fixators prior to ORIF and were included in the study.
- Results: Eighteen of the 179 Irrigation and Debridement cohort (10.0%) and 8 of the 155 Simple Scrubbing cohort (5.2%) had infections that required a return to the operating room. No statistical difference (p = 0.10) or meaningful effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.18) were found between irrigation and debridement and simple scrubbing of external fixator pin sites.
- Conclusions: Given no significant differences were found in deep infection rates between debridement of pin sites versus simply scrubbing, it is reasonable to ask whether the time and resources required for debriding external fixator pin sites is worthwhile.
- Keywords: bone fracture; external fixation device; orthopedics; surgical site infection.
- Conference Presentations:
- Orthopedic Research Society National Conference.
- Presenter: Johnathan Dallman
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Presentation Date: February 2023
- Presentation Type: Poster
- Orthopedic Research Society National Conference.
Managing Post-Operative Pain in Orthopedic Patients: An International Comparison
- Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957592/
- Authors: Jack M Ayres, Johnathan Dallman, Jack A Nolte, Nicholas Higginbotham, Jordan Baker, Greg Horton, Jonathon Salava, John Sojka, Kimberly J Templeton, Radu Ioan Malancea, Archie Heddings
- Journal: Kansas Journal of Medicine
- Publication Date: February 21, 2023
- Abstract:
- Introduction: Opioids play a crucial role in post-operative pain management in America, but not in some other countries. We sought to determine if a discrepancy in opioid use between the United States (U.S.) and Romania, a country that administers opioids in a conservative fashion, would show in subjective pain control differences.
- Methods: Between May 23, 2019, and November 23, 2019, 244 Romanian patients and 184 American patients underwent total hip arthroplasty or the surgical treatment of the following fractures: bimalleolar ankle, distal radius, femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and tibial-fibular. Opioid and non-opioid analgesic medication use and subjective pain scores during the first and second 24 hours after surgery were analyzed.
- Results: Subjective pain scores for the first 24 hours were higher among patients in Romania compared to the U.S. (p < 0.0001), but Romanians reported lower pain scores than U.S. patients in the second 24-hours (p < 0.0001). The quantity of opioids given to U.S. patients did not differ significantly based on sex (p = 0.4258) or age (p = 0.0975). However, females reported higher pain scores than male patients following the studied procedures (p = 0.0181). No sex-based differences in pain scores were noted among Romanian patients.
- Conclusions: Higher pain scores in American females, despite equivalent amounts of narcotics to their male counterparts, and the absence of a difference in Romanians suggested that the current American post-operative pain regimen may be tailored to the needs of male patients. In addition, it pointed to the impacts of gender, compared to sex, in pain experiences. Future research should look for the safest, most efficacious pain regimen suitable for all patients.
- Keywords: opioid analgesics; orthopedic procedures; pain management; pain measurement; postoperative pain.
- Conference Presentations:
- Orthopedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting
- Presenter: Jack Nolte
- Location: Tampa, FL
- Presentation Date: October 2022
- Presentation Type: Poster
- Organization for the Study of Sex Differences Annual Meeting
- Presenter: Jack Ayres
- Location: Marina del Rey, CA
- Presentation Date: May 2022
- Presentation Type: Poster
- Orthopedic Research Society National Conference.
- Presenter: Jack Nolte
- Location: Tampa, FL
- Presentation Date: February 2022
- Presentation Type: Poster
- Kansas Opioid and Stimulant Conference
- Presenter: Johnathan Dallman
- Location: Virtual
- Presentation Date: November 2021
- Presentation Type: Podium
- Kansas American College of Physicians
- Presenter: Jack Nolte
- Location: Virtual
- Presentation Date: October 2021
- Presentation Type: Poster
- Orthopedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting
Injury Care: A Missing Piece in the December 15, 2022 U.S.-Africa Leaders’ Summit
- Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957596/
- Authors: Terrence B. Epie, Ojas Patel, Jack Ayres, Albers Haley, Ravali Reddy, Wendy Metumah, Austin Gartner, Johnathan Dallman, Archie Heddings
- Journal: Kansas Journal of Medicine
- Publication Date: February 21, 2023
- Abstract: No Abstract Available.
- Full Text:
- Globally, road traffic injuries, falls, interpersonal violence, and self-harm are leading causes of mortality, and these burdens are larger than that of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and malaria combined.1 More than 90% of injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Africa,2 which has the largest youthful population in the world3 resulting in a more active population that is prone to injuries.4 The rate of injuries in Africa per 100,000 population doubled between 1990 and 2015.5 This is attributed to major infrastructural development and poor maintenance of road networks. Unfortunately, the African health system has not kept pace with this increase in injuries. Some of the most glaring shortfalls are few trained health personnel to treat injuries, such as orthopedic surgeons, and lack of state-of-the-art equipment and implants.
- On December 15, 2022, the Biden Administration pledged to spend $55 billion over the next three years in Africa. This involves $1.33 billion annually to address gaps in the health workforce.6 It will be a great opportunity to invest in capacity building for health personnel on trauma/injury care like training more orthopedic surgeons and supporting international orthopedic fellowships. Likewise, $782 million was pledged to address health security and health system strengthening. Our speculation is that nothing will be allocated to address injury care in Africa. It, therefore, will be a missed opportunity if trauma care is not prioritized in this strategic initiative.
- Over the last two decades, the U.S. government through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS relief (PEPFAR) has spent over $100 billion to address HIV/AIDS globally and particularly in Africa.7 In FY2022, the U.S. government spent over $1 billion on malaria related activities through initiatives like the President’s Malaria Initiative,8 but little has been committed to address the growing burden of injury in Africa. We have seen how initiatives like PEPFAR, the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative, Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN), the Global Fund, and the Vaccine Alliance (GAVI) have contributed to reduce the gap or, in some cases, reverse the trend in diseases across Africa. All these initiatives have used a global health approach, with collaborative partnership and a global funding mechanism.
- Some of the December 15 financial pledge should be used to begin groundwork for an African Injury Alliance, to strengthen human capacity through training of primary health care workers on trauma/injury care, increasing the number of orthopedic surgeons, and partnering with manufacturers to establish a supply chain network for high quality affordable implants and state-of-the-art equipment. All these will reduce wait time for surgical interventions, increase the quality of care, and decrease post-operative complications, thus contributing to productive gains and fostering economic development.
- There is a similar initiative at the University of Kansas Medical Center called the African Trauma Initiative with objectives to provide a yearlong fellowship for African orthopedic surgeons in various orthopedic subspecialties with a focus on treatment of injuries and their sequelae. It also partners with U.S. implant and equipment manufacturers to provide a sustainable supply of state-of-the-art orthopedic implants and equipment to African hospitals. With sufficient national funding, such a program could be extended to other academic programs across America resulting in a substantial impact on injury care in Africa.9
- Currently, we are lagging in efforts to address the burden of injuries in Africa, and we need to establish realistic global targets and a path towards achieving them through global funding mechanisms and collaborative partnerships like the U.S.-African leaders’ summit.